Cruising Sailors Forum Archive
No, but I do prefer to be paid in specie rather than species. 
In Response To: Was that remark on species specious? ()
() Messages In This Thread
- Tell me it is not true!
- It sounds so absurd it probably IS true
- Have not heard anything about it... Yet.
- Will be interesting...
- The irony of such a law is overwhelming...
- Re: The irony
- So removing invasive species from a hull directly into the water is somehow better?
- Re: Invasive species
- Complete horse shit!
- Re: Horse shit
- So lets get this straight
- Re: Blame the divers
- No it's the commercial ships, mainly
- You rose to the bait ... not unexpected
- I'm confused ---
- Re: Confused
- But the rule seems to be targeting boats that specifically STAY in the area.
- Re: Confused
- Please explain four things about invasive critters
- Seriously?
- species
- Was that remark on species specious?
- No, but I do prefer to be paid in specie rather than species.
- No, but I do prefer to be paid in specie rather than species.
- Was that remark on species specious?
- Seriously?
- Please explain four things about invasive critters
- Re: Confused
- invasive hull attaching species
- But the rule seems to be targeting boats that specifically STAY in the area.
- Re: Confused
- Re: Blame the divers
- So lets get this straight
- Re: Horse shit
- Complete horse shit!
- Re: Invasive species
- So removing invasive species from a hull directly into the water is somehow better?
- The irony is that ships and such are not bound by this and they are major offenders.
- Re: The irony
- Port of San Diego Divers Permit
- It sounds so absurd it probably IS true
