Cruising Sailors Forum Archive

Messages In This Thread

• What is the correct paperwork for when you are foreign
  • Wouldn't that be 'Power of Attorney?'
    • Just talked to the Admiral asking what she would do.
  • In Mexico....
    • That could be an easier way around the problem
      • What about on the documentation papers...
      • I know of 2 times it was required
  • Found it- it's called "joint tenancy"
    • Then the boat would be community property.
      • Point was- if in another country, and boat is registered solely
        • Charlie,
          • Oh I've done that, and erased cookies. I've tried it all
            • Your security settings are set too tight
            • I AM using Firefox
            • Settings
              • How about why do folks avoid IE...
                • I suspect you're spreading a false rumor
                  • In 2004 specifically...
                    • I am with GeneC
                    • In 2004 they thought Java was "safe"
                      • Been at least two new updates to Java since that date
                        • And there will be more. That was a key point.
                  • Don't like Chrome.
                    • Me either, for that same reason. I use Safari on the Iphone
                • I dunno nuthin' but been using IE all the time for 18'ish years......
              • Ok, changed settings, and erased cookies. Let's see what happens
                • well, that got rid of the invalid password it seems. Name field still comes up blank
        • Why would the boat only be registered in your name?
          • Dan- the question wasn't for me. It was trying to find an answer
            • Emphasizing the caution mentioned in the Pardey's blog.
    • Correct terminology - "joint tenancy with full rights of survivorship"
      • Yep...I'm not a lawyer
        • Yes, In THIS country. Question was for use in another countryr
        • I put this on USCG documentation papers
          • We
  • Appears to me you have two options.
    • Dave- see my response to Dan, just above. But thanks.