Return to Index
Read Responses
Cruising Sailors Forum Archive
OOPS. That should read "I'm NOT as skilled of a navigator…"
In Response To:
They had two detailed CMap FOBs
()
Messages In This Thread
The official report on the TEAM VESTAS WIND grounding last November has been released...
'lucky enough' or, simply missed the island by accident.
No matter what charts, it will be a long time before somebody slams THAT island again.
a long time??
It will seem like a looooooooong time to Team Vestas.
Some interesting tidbits you didn't report:
I agree with all that. You can't blame the tools you don't use for your problems.
Me too. You can't require reading to eliminate complacency.
That's a VERY thoughful analysis...
The simplest and quickest action
Yeah, but the navigator was not using the chartplotters for passage planning/routing...
They had two detailed CMap FOBs
Amazing how quickly the paper vs electronic chart debate, has waned.
OOPS. That should read "I'm NOT as skilled of a navigator…"
Nah, you're wrong about that...
As always, your input on this stuff is greatly appreciated...
I agree that glancing at a paper chart would have shown the danger
All good points, again...
Unlocked CMap
This navigational error looked typical to me from the start. There is only one thing that still surprises me.
Yeah, but the VOR ain't your run-of-the-mill Oyster Millenium RTW Rally, however... (grin)
Thanks, that answers my question. Case closed.
That restriction seems to be all about phone communication
Think about weight . . .
They share tooth brushes?
Probably right, but it's not about texting. GPS and world charts. Who wants to be in the dark today?
Again, the restrictions according to the Notice of the Race are considerable...
Too bad, they may have been saved a lot of grief by one hand held device, and another pair of eyes.
Perhaps, but I still say a quick glance at the British Admiralty or DMA chart of the Western Indian Ocean ...
I will dispute your point #1...
Pull up a raster chart of that entire ocean
I did not dispute that, just your point #1.
I would need to see an actual example
It is not a matter of resolution, it is presentation and cognition...
You just changed your argument
I have a full scale paper chart of Penobscot Bay.
If you disposed of the chart every day after you used it once, yes. We use paper charts years, not hours. ;^)))
Not charts, we dispose of newspaper every day.
I did not change (read it again
) - mainly arguing number of pixels i.e. information.
I did not change (read it again
) - mainly arguing number of pixels i.e. information.
Our Nobeltec (the old one and the "new-one", after MaxSea)
In this case Cmap uses a USB FOB
Jeppson refused to provide anwsers unless they had editorial control
This paragraph bothered me:
Musical Chairs?