it is my main objection to electronic charting. Technology will eventually mitigate the concern, but on most plotters/laptops it is still there. And that is that many, many more pixels can be displayed on a paper chart than a small LCD display. And your eye is very good at quickly scanning and 'zooming' in on critical details. Much better, and much quicker, than scanning about and zooming with a trackpad or fingers. I would not use this as an excuse for missing such a large hazard, but in other instances you might pan and zoom your 12" screen quite a long time and still miss something small, which would jump right into your eye sockets from a large paper chart. So while the information in a raster and paper chart might be identical, the presentation is distinctly not. If I had a 4xHD 30" display, then it would be.