of course people can disagree. On printed charts, I have the opportunity to view a small or large scale chart, at full eye resolution, filling my entire visual field. This provides maximum informational intake. You cannot do that on today's digital displays. It's fine to say you have adapted to the small window by zooming and panning, but you are using a fraction of the data path available to your brain: you are handicapped. Walk around holding that cardboard cutout in front of you. Peripheral vision is cut off, and cognitive intake suffers.

Another point you raise is hand drawn vs. machine drawn charts AKA raster vs. vector. Vector charts, in their current state of development, do not convey the same information as raster charts. Some are better than others, the NOAA ENC charts being particularly bad. Like displays, this gets better over time, but today is not on par. The human drawing the chart knew what to draw your eye to, which features to emphasize, etc. This is done in many subtle ways such as line weights, shading, etc. The same is true of any CAD drawings which generally look flat and lifeless compared to one drawn by a skilled draftsman. In advanced CAD packages, there are now simulations of the "hand drawn" effect available, sometimes used for presentation because it conveys more information quicker.

Now, these things play together: the vector chart was designed for digital display, and works better there than the raster equivalents. A trivial example are the notes on a raster chart: these cannot be viewed and read at the same time as viewing the feature they refer to, because either you are zoomed back too far to read the notes, or zoomed in on the notes and cannot see the features. If raster charts are stitched by the charting software, notes and other information can get cut off entirely. None of these are problems on the vector chart, but then you have the flat vector charts. Vector charts will eventually win this battle, but today they are not without drawbacks.

I am certainly not a Luddite, having spent a career in developing personal computers and their derivative devices. But I recognize their current limitations as well. And chart plotters are always about 5 years behind state of the art consumer devices.