Return to Index
Read Responses
Cruising Sailors Forum Archive
Yes, that's true but the charting error was, most likely, the same.
In Response To:
They were on autopilot
()
Messages In This Thread
Video of Vestas Wind grounding released...
Watching the beginning a second time, one thing is abundantly clear to me...
Can't help but wonder what they were "checking out..."
Incredible video. This is copy on YouTube which may view better.
A crash gybe or tack is probably easier said than done...
As I look at it, they were on a port tack
You can bet the remaining 6 VOR boats are running their depth sounders now...
What a crash! I'm glad they aren't blaming the zooming red herring.
Doesn't sound like the issue of Zooming is a red herring, at all...
His mistake, as he says. He checks on paper as well.
From the sound of it, he looked at the paper chart before they were rerouted
And if the paper charts are back-up as opposed to in use-piloting,
Hard to believe any reference to a paper chart was made within hundreds of miles prior to the grounding...
Insurance probably isn't the issue...
On my freakin' globe too!
The owner should receive full value insured. That's what it's for, mistakes in navigation, etc.
I posted an electronic chart on the other thread
I don't have the echarts, but here it is on Google maps.
It's almost a carbon copy of what happened
They were on autopilot
Yes, that's true but the charting error was, most likely, the same.
Of all electronics, I find AP the most 'dangerous'.
Actually, that's not what the subsequent inquests determined...
The first scene in "All is Lost" was the most compelling part in the whole movie to me.
Except for one huge issue, Steve (and others)...
You are right about the islands. Every
What's ahead???
I once hit a rock that had a sign on it . . .
My look ahead line is set for 20 miles.
In a press conference this morning, they admitted the simple failure to zoom in sufficiently was the cause...
Thanks. I didn't listen to the whole things, but ...
They were aware of the depth... see this other post...
Using the image you posted, Jon, I have a question
The magenta line designates the "Seaward Limit of Territorial Sea"...
Can Jon or anyone that has these e-charts, tell me the approximate NM distance across this screen shot?
I don't have C-map for that part of the world...
"the simple failure to zoom in sufficiently was the cause"
Hey, I'm just repeating what they said... (grin)
Scale on map you requested, Tom.
Here's another map, it's a bit older...
Those damn Portuguese apparently had the are scoped.
Note the light at the southwest end; and, the notes on "Strong Currents.
Right to the east of the Breakers to the North
Thanks, but I'm curious, how far out do you need to zoom(NM's of visible chart), when only 40 meter depths show?
Not a lot -- couple of clicks.
An illustration of the different levels of zooming...
The lighthouse specs
Good e-chart academics but I'd like to see the area on their screens and software.
Sounds like all of the boats are running a routing program called Expedition...
Wow! A world of potential distractions, for sure.
"To win you have to finish"
Seems like your post poses quite a conundrum for your thesis regarding paper charts
Don't want to speak for the other Jon, but for me e-charts are far from useless, but OTOH raster are far from outdated.
The Furuno, MaxSea, Nobeltec, and others
Zooming electronic charts is pretty much the same as CAD..
Some are 2D -- but a bunch are 3D, now Jon (Anomaly , version :^))) )
But the 3D modes are designed and marketed to weekend powerboats - not was Vestas (and most sailors) are looking at.
Many of the charts have the information imbedded?
Well, I'm not proposing that these racers should be navigating solely using paper charts at all...
I don't think my point is coming across well
The Notice of the Race requires all boats to carry the "appropriate" paper charts for each leg...
The fact that the data is there was necessary, but not sufficient. The boat got ahead of the navigator...
On spot, DDW. I'm perplexed
Yeah! Good idea! I meandered about on need for new user interface ideas in my post below.
Split screen????
Do we know that they did not have a paper chart?
My point has always been, that by merely looking at a paper chart...
At current state of the art, paper simply displays MUCH more information....
I'm not arguing that point, or the relative resolutions
Don't know...
That's a really good post, Jon...
That's a weird looking design for a Ferrari piece. Isn't that their symbol on that wheel?
Excellent comments, DDW. Merits more than 36 or so views.
According to the rules (via Jon), they did have paper charts on board
Nobody is asking the Volvo boats to plot on paper
OK, here's an example to try to illustrate my point...
Now, here's my full iPad screen view...
Ipad!! You're coming around, Jon. You've lost some of the fire and brimstone in your crusade.
I'm sure he has one for Real Racing 3 - not navigation
There's at least one exception
Chris -- Are your Navionics charts updated?
No subscription.
I'm only equipped for New England. The Bahamas have always been an exception.
Monty and Sara Lewis's Explorer charts are very reliable.
Orpheus Rk via Navionics, as you say, mileage may vary
Just a 'couple of clicks' away.
I am SURPRISED the keal held up....
This latest vid puts a whole new spin on it...
Yes, It's refreshing to know that it's not just one guy, no warning, no other chances, etc.
'Note' not 'not'
Amazing moments recorded. I sensed we're witnessing raw shock and it's effect on people.
The noise below as that hull slammed into the coral and ground rapidly to a stop
All sailors make mistakes
Absolutely, the way they responded was exemplary...
Jon, when/where is Chancy's next trip likely to be?
Back up here, to Saglek Fiord...
Be sure to let us know if you might be able to stop in Belfast
Spin? Looks like they're disclosing facts as they come in.
I didn't mean "spin", in that sense...
Another vid, with some different material...
EAG-Electronically Assisted Grounding-
Paper vs Electronic
What's that???
Missing paper charts
We have them for British Columbia
Correction: Seal and Mud Islands
I can see that happening. I had to zoom out to 90 NM for those islands to disappear on an ipad.
At 19 knots, the boat is going through 300 yards in 10 seconds, or so.
Do you remember the days of, "Oh my god, it's official, I don't know where we are?"
I remember a few of those times. It was hard over
Wow! Fast thinking. My sailing life could have been altered by crossing the Gulf Stream with no Loran, and two babies...
Back in my Sat Nav days it was
I don't think anyone is expecting Volvo racers to plot o paper charts . . .
I think the navigator(captain) said a last minute change left no time for the usual pre-course strategy?
That's been debunked, someone over on SA posted a diagram of the original Exclusion Zone prior at the start of Leg 2...
Curiosity to look?
That's a long post, Jon. Time is alittle short today,...
Who knows, but it might have...
Oh, and the one team that I think never would have hit the shoal (aka reef, aka shoal, aka whateve
There you go, eyes on the paper and pixels.
Interesting that the ladies on SCA were the only boat to pass to the east of the Cargados Carajos (grin)
I guess no one uses depth sounder alarms anymore?
That's the real head-scratcher, they KNEW they were getting into shallow water...
Well that makes it only more wonderous - if I am crossing a 40m shoal in the middle of a 3000m ocean.....
You're absolutely right about the depth alarm.
Funny how people can hear the same thing differently
Sorry, I should have said over 100 yards (316', or so) in 10 seconds